We represent a former Carleton student who alleges she was sexually assaulted by her dance instructor. We are seeking information related to Carleton's dance program and any unwelcome conduct from current or former professors or dance instructors, including Donald Smith.

Please email: contact@tamaraholder.com or call 312-440-9000 if you have any information about Donald Smith, Carleton, or Carleton's dance program.

NOTE: This content originally appeared in MPR News on June 20, 2024.
June 20, 2024

In a federal lawsuit, a former Carleton College student alleges that a campus dance instructor groomed and sexually assaulted her.

The alleged victim, who’s named as Jane Doe in the complaint, attended the school in Northfield from 2019 to 2022. She took salsa classes from Don Smith, whose primary campus job was assistant director of institutional research.

According to Doe’s suit, Smith allegedly claimed to be a champion dancer, positioned himself as her mentor and continually pressured her for sex. In the fall of 2021, when Doe was a junior, she enrolled in his intermediate salsa class while also serving as his paid co-instructor for the beginners’ class.

According to the lawsuit, Smith also told Doe about his “violent tendencies” and said that he was a “diagnosed sociopath who had intense issues with anger and violence.” He allegedly required her to meet at his home near campus every weekend to plan lessons and practice, and chided her for not being “assertive or sensual enough.”

We represent a former Carleton student who alleges she was sexually assaulted by her dance instructor. We are seeking information related to Carleton's dance program and any unwelcome conduct from current or former professors or dance instructors, including Donald Smith.

Please email: contact@tamaraholder.com or call 312-440-9000 if you have any information about Donald Smith, Carleton, or Carleton's dance program.

NOTE: This content originally appeared in The Carletonian on September 27, 2024.
September 27, 2024

Classes have started back up at Carleton, but there’s one notable change to many student’s schedules: the PE curriculum has been altered significantly.

The wide variety of PE courses taught by Carleton students have been almost entirely canceled, though some classes now have student assistants helping teach and faculty in charge, rather than being entirely student-led (some of these classes include rock climbing, juggling, Afrofit, and Nordic skiing). The total number of PE courses offered in the fall has decreased from 26 in 2023 to 16 this year (not including club or varsity sports that provide PE credit).

Additionally, instead of a large majority of PE classes taking place outside of the normal class schedule, these classes are now being taught during normal class block times.

The Physical Education, Recreation, and Athletics (PEAR) department chair Heidi Jaynes stated that the changes were made primarily because of an external review. An external review is a typical process for all departments on campus, in which roughly every ten years, a committee overseen by the Provost and the Education and Curriculum is formed. According to the Carleton website, this committee “offers a comparative perspective and assesses the overall shape and quality of the department and program and proposes suggestions for shaping its future.”

Jaynes explained, “We agreed that we wanted to make curricular changes such as adding more variety of classes taught by PEAR faculty and staff, supporting the late afternoon time slots for student wellness and extracurricular activities, partnering with the Dance department on more classes and removing student-led classes that no longer align with our policies around attendance, grading, supervision, and assessments.”

Regarding the changes to PE class schedules, Jaynes explained that the changes were made “in order to support times for extracurricular activities such as athletics, dance, theater, music and club sports. We have classes between 8 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. so that our PEAR faculty and staff can also shift to teaching their varsity sport teams during their afternoon/evening practices and competitions.”

One student who took Beginning West Coast Swing in the spring of  2024, a student-taught class that has since been canceled, Colin Willette ’27, feels disappointed by the changes made.

“I had a fun time in the class I took, and I feel like a really big part of that was the relaxed atmosphere the student instructors created.” Had the classes continued to be offered, Willette feels he would have taken more. “Obviously I have to keep taking PE classes because of the graduation requirement, but I think I would have gravitated towards the student-led classes.”

He also voiced concerns about the schedule changes, noting that “it’s already hard enough to schedule classes without overlap in a way that doesn’t create a crazy schedule, and now we have to worry about PE on top of that.”

The cancellation of student-instructed classes has been particularly impactful on those who relied on teaching the classes for their tuition. Carolina Cabanela ’25, who taught social dance, was one of those affected.

There were about eight students in charge of teaching Social Dance I, Social Dance I Accelerated, and Social Dance II, with two or three instructors per class. Cabanela taught one term of each class in the 2023-2024 school year and was expecting to teach again this fall.

However, “on a Friday in early May, all eight of us got an email that said, ‘We’re so sorry, but we will have to cancel Social II this term, and we will also be canceling Social I Accelerated. We are keeping Social I, though, so you pick one of the eight of you to teach the class next term,” Cabanela explained. They gave the eight students four to five hours to decide one of them that would instruct Social I.

“A lot of us use this towards tuition, almost all of us have jobs that we use to fund tuition, so it’s kinda scary, especially in May after all of the other places have finished their applications. So it was like, ‘aw man, we might be losing our jobs,’ which is scary.”

The student instructors negotiated with PEAR to allow for two student instructors along with the faculty member supervising the class, because social dance requires both a follower and a leader and the faculty member would not be a dancer.

Cabanela was selected to be one of the instructors for Social Dance I. She was disappointed in the class cancellations, but thought, “At least we kept Social Dance I, we’ll go with it.”

The school year ended without Cabanela receiving any updates on the class, but then Cabanela was surprised with more bad news. “I was at lunch and one of my friends showed me a screenshot of an email on her phone, and it said, ‘Oh, I’m so sorry, your social dance class has been canceled, please pick another PE class.’ And I thought to myself, that’s weird because I did not get an email about this.”

Cabanela contacted Jaynes and found out that the class had been canceled due to low attendance. The class had seven students enrolled, and the incoming freshmen had yet to register for classes. The Carleton policy for PE classes does state that “If enrollment is too low in a class, then the class may be canceled,” but it does not state the exact number of students that would be considered low enrollment.

Jaynes and Cabanela met over Zoom to discuss what happened, and Cabanela learned that all of the student-taught classes had been canceled for the fall and winter terms (except for the classes that were reformatted with student assistants and faculty supervisors or teachers).

PEAR offered to fund weekly dances for all of the dance clubs and teams at Carleton with the funds they would have spent on paying instructors, but Cabanela didn’t take them up on the offer. “I kind of just gave up after that because it was like they weren’t being honest, it didn’t feel honest, at least.”

Cabanela, who is also a captain of the ballroom dance team, has both concerns and hopes for the future of social dance at Carleton. Even if classes were to eventually return in the spring or next year, she worries that it won’t be the same. “I think, the person that I am, I will always have hope. Because I really want there to be classes. The problem is that if we go an entire year without teaching classes, all of our teachers graduate.”

In response to the disappointment voiced by students, Jaynes said, “We are grateful for the students who helped teach some classes in the past, but we have valued the experience from our external review and have made changes to better align with our PEAR mission and policies for our Carleton community.”

Nevertheless, Cabanela wants to remain hopeful about returning to teaching before she graduates in the spring. “I don’t have super high hopes about it, but we’re totally willing [to return to teaching], please! It would be great. I love teaching, I love dancing, I love teaching new dancers, I love meeting new dancers, I love that sort of stuff.”

We represent a former Carleton student who alleges she was sexually assaulted by her dance instructor. We are seeking information related to Carleton's dance program and any unwelcome conduct from current or former professors or dance instructors, including Donald Smith.

Please email: contact@tamaraholder.com or call 312-440-9000 if you have any information about Donald Smith, Carleton, or Carleton's dance program.

 

NOTE: This content originally appeared in The Carletonian on September 27, 2024.
September 27, 2024

You cannot register for Social Dance I, Social Dance II, West Coast or Lindy Hop anymore. Staples of Carleton dance and the PE program have been cut, and attempts by the dance community to understand why have been met with no response, confusing responses or lies from the administration. Without these PE classes, students have less ability to find dance as a creative outlet, to learn and go on to teach at various social events at Carleton, such as the social dance events at Date Knight, Midwinter Ball and Valentine’s). Everyone will come into contact with social dance at some point during their time at Carleton, and it is disheartening to see such an important part of campus life thrown to the wayside without sufficient reasoning or communication from the administration.

Why should you care about the loss of these dance classes? For one, any student at this college should be adverse to any administrative decision regarding students that was made without consultation and seemingly only to the detriment of those students. For two, it makes the PE requirement so much harder. We have to take four terms of PE, and the changes to the schedule and cutting of classes makes it that much harder for anybody to find a PE class that fits their schedule or their interest. Social Dance, especially in the winter, is one of the better-attended PE classes such that we offer it in multiple sections, and even an accelerated version for those wanting to learn it for Midwinter Ball. For three, many here will encounter social dance at some point. Taking your date or friend or whoever for a waltz at Midwinter Ball, or taking your blind date to a social dance class to make things less awkward at Date Knight are all pretty common experiences on this campus. We as the social dance community are asked to do a lot to support larger administration-run events, and we love to share our dancing with whomever is interested.

The problem with cutting all student-led social dance classes is that knowing how to dance and teaching dance are two entirely different skills. When you don’t have students shadowing more experienced student-teachers, and then teaching themselves, there is a lack of experience and a huge difficulty curve when later on dancers are asked to take on the quite difficult task of teaching the basics of dance to dozens of people at a big event. It makes for worse teaching, worse dancers and a worse experience for the people trying to learn dance for a good night out. The administration is not giving the students the chance to even learn how to teach by cutting these classes. How do you expect people who have never taught five people dance to suddenly teach a room of 50 how to dance in less than an hour?

This is egregious because dance, and especially ballroom, passes down from upper to lowerclassmen. All the tips, tricks and easy explanations of moves that make for effective teaching are already being lost, and will be entirely gone by the next academic year if Physical Education, Athletics, and Recreation (PEAR) does not move to reinstate these classes. Everybody on this campus has had a brush with social dance in one form or the other, and so if for nothing other than being able to have a less awkward, better-run time at the biggest events of the year, you should care that the social dance community is dying at the hands of the administration’s poorly thought out decision making. As PEAR has told us, there will be no social dance or any student-led PE classes even in the Winter. That’s two whole terms where nobody is actively practicing how to teach dance, and come spring and beyond we lose all of our graduating seniors (of which there are more than there are juniors), so much of the damage done is already irreparable. We are asking that they reconsider and reverse course before it gets even worse, but they have refused to do anything despite countless emails and meetings with their staff.

If none of that matters to you, the way that the administration has handled this should matter to you as a student of this institution. Note that student-teachers also earn money from their employment. PEAR decided to cancel social dance classes in July after allowing students to register for dance classes, and further decided to communicate this cancellation only to the students of the social dance class, and not the teachers. It was only when a student emailed one of the teachers that they even found out that they were no longer teaching. Student employment is a guaranteed part of financial aid at Carleton, and for a department to wantonly decide to cut employment with no warning to students is not only highly unprofessional but a worrying overreach of the position of power that the administration holds over the finances of students. Despite repeated pleas in private to just communicate, PEAR refused to give a reason behind their decision or why they continue to not hear student demands to continue a very important part of Carleton culture. This article is a testament to a total failure in communication between administration and student, where acts in good faith are met with silence or deception on behalf of the administration. An administration that makes unilateral decisions with no student involvement or input, in an opaque and unclear way, and seemingly only to make things worse for everyone involved, is not the kind of administration that we as Carleton students should be okay with having.

This is further worrying because of the knock-on effects this has on the wider social dance community itself. These social dance classes are often the first time many of us learn about dance and how fun and interesting it can be. Many people in the dance community stayed because having social dance as a PE class is an easy way to justify doing something cool but now having a reason to actually spend time on by getting credit for doing it. The removal of social dance as a PE class raises the bar to entry for dance, and in the long term is very likely to result in a decreased interest in dance overall.

Carleton, even among its peer institutions, has an especially heavy commitment to the freedom of a liberal arts education. For that same institution to espouse how free its education is and then stifle dance by making it tangibly more difficult to participate in is at best ignorant and at worst hypocritical. And need I point out that dance, while something we all do from time to time, as an academic discipline is thought of very poorly and as a waste of time compared to more “serious” subjects of study like Biology? The decision to further undervalue the study of dance by limiting options, as students push for more variety in Folk Dance and Lindy Hop classes, is not only a tone-deaf response to increased student involvement in dance but a betrayal of the ideal of a truly free liberal arts education where students are encouraged, not punished, for pursuing interests outside their intended paths.

Despite how it may come off at times, the point of this article is not to spread vitriol against the administration and is instead a request for answers. The writing here is a product of months of frustration, a lack of communication and honestly a lack of respect for the students here who put in so much time and effort out of their stacked schedules in order to bring the joy of dancing to everyone who may be interested in it. We, as students and as a social dance community, deserve better than being systemically cut out of our spaces. We deserve better.

magnifiercross